A call about a line outage or message from an operator that “something’s wrong” is not a good start to the day. Early warning signs are there to be found. However, maintenance engineers can’t be everywhere at once. Time between data rounds is when something can go wrong, and some equipment isn’t on a data collection route.
Many experienced maintenance professionals are at or near retirement age. With fewer replacements on the horizon, manufacturers are increasingly looking to industrial technology to maximize worker productivity to unlock capacity and improve overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). Better uptime starts with better data. These four technologies help provide better data quality and access to the teams that keep plants up and running.
Isn’t it odd that monitoring professionals walk routes between equipment to gather data, yet technology on the market can help consumers see inside a refrigerator with their cell phones?
This technology exists for turbomachinery. Analysts can decide which plant, line, or asset they need to visit to best impact reliability before grabbing their hard hats or car keys. The goal of remote diagnostics is to provide data that, as much as possible, alleviates the need for analysts to be on-site. The concept is simple: connect sensor data to an IT network, so experts receive asset health data through a web browser rather than traveling to collect it with handheld instrumentation and their own senses.
It’s important to note the different types of data needed for remote diagnostics. Many systems report overall feature calculations (RMS, peak-peak, 1X/2X magnitude, and so on), and others report full waveform data. Overall, feature calculations alarm on general problems and are used to identify some failure modes, but feature alarms need a follow-up analysis with waveform data (typically captured by handheld devices) for more in-depth analysis (see Figure 1). If waveform data is the goal, the systems that connect waveform data to the cloud are the ones that most effectively improve productivity.
Figure 1. This vibration measurement layout in NI InsightCM™ shows an RMS trend line, waveform, spectrum, and envelope analysis. Web access to waveform data and analysis helps experts remotely diagnose asset health.
Remote analysis, at minimum, provides peace of mind without involving road trips, catwalks, ad hoc plant walk downs, or calls to the expert who is currently out of town. In some cases, remote analysis can prevent a profit draining outage.
Vibration data is one of the primary measurements for asset health, but it’s not the only sensor technology used to diagnose problems. Oil analysis, motor-current signature analysis, infrared thermography, electromagnetic signature analysis, and others are used to capture a broader range of failure modes and conduct differential diagnosis. Server software for asset monitoring must be able to manage data from multiple sensor technologies so analysts can have more confidence in their remote diagnosis and know how to best focus their time. A more critical piece of equipment may not be as big a risk to uptime as a less critical asset with a more devastating issue.
Experienced analysts use their senses to help diagnose equipment problems: does the machine sound, smell, or look off? Now software technology (see Figure 2) can convert digitized accelerometer data into an audio file so analysts can listen for problems as if they were standing in front of the equipment.
Figure 2. Software technology converts raw, digitized accelerometer data into an audio file so analysts can listen for problems from across the factory or across the country.
The biggest cost driver for permanently installed instrumentation is typically installation, including engineering design and a contractor to run conduit for power and Ethernet. Transmitting sensor data wirelessly greatly reduces this cost.
From a communication standpoint, there is no single standard that is best at everything. A wide variety of wireless standards and protocols (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, ISA100, WirelessHART, LoRa, and several 900 MHz variants) can help vendors assemble wireless instrumentation to cost-effectively pull vibration data from 20-year-old pumps, motors, fans, and other assets.
Advancements in sensor digitization components, such as analog-to-digital converters, are generating waveform quality data from the same piezoelectric sensors used with portable systems. These, however, are permanently mounted to the asset and wirelessly connected to an IT network to reduce, or eliminate, the need for routes. (See Figure 3.)
Figure 3. Wireless instrumentation (shown connected to standard, piezoelectric accelerometers) reduces the cost of high-quality waveform data.
Silicon technology companies designing MEMS sensors for mass markets, such as gaming consoles, consumer automobiles, and smartphones, are using that same design expertise to target industrial markets. MEMS sensors, like most electronic technologies, are continuing to shrink, use less power, and provide higher quality measurements. This makes them a good fit to measure vibration data for machine health.
Most MEMS sensors for condition monitoring (see Figure 4) include a sensor, signal digitization circuitry (if needed), a battery, and a wireless radio all built into mechanical packaging for a specific operating environment. The installation is about as easy as it gets. The main difference from traditional piezoelectric sensors is the need for a few gateways installed around the plant.
Many MEMS vibration sensors are triaxial and include a temperature sensor. This makes them a relatively low-cost way to connect problematic assets that otherwise wouldn’t be worth adding to a collection route or running conduit to. Instead of having data visibility into only the top 5 percent of plant assets, maintenance teams can cover the top 20 percent of assets most likely to have issues and contribute to downtime risk.
Figure 4. A MEMS-based sensor connected to a vertically installed motor wirelessly sends data to experts for analysis. The lower cost of installing MEMS sensors help connect more plant asset data to IT networks.
Asset health data is “big data.” A single pump-motor skid with a few triaxial accelerometers connected to permanent instrumentation can generate over 20 GB of data per day. The cloud essentially has “infinite” processing capability, but a plant can’t feasibly push all the sensor data to the cloud for processing.
Technology vendors in the condition monitoring market are packaging the latest processing elements into rugged, passively cooled devices to help manage large amounts of raw sensor data before it leaves the plant floor. Most data from manufacturing equipment is benign and if recorded would only bog down the analysts as they seek the important artifacts within. Smart monitoring devices screen the data looking for predesignated features. When they find these features, such as RMS or crest factor limits, they log the data and send it to the server software for access by an analyst.
Route-based acquisition records data at a predesignated time regardless of asset health measurements. Twenty-four hours after an asset is measured, it could start showing signs of bearing wear that wouldn’t be caught until the next route three months later. By contrast, continuous monitoring equipment records data for a predesignated feature so teams get only the data they want.
Data captures from startups hold valuable information but can be logistically difficult to acquire. Getting the right person with the right instrumentation in front of the asset at the right time can be difficult. This is especially true when manufacturers have more plants than reliability experts and more reliability experts than instrumentation. On top of those logistics, some startups are unplanned (think peaking units for power generators or auxiliary equipment).
Edge processing technology helps manage the big data of asset health monitoring. By continuously acquiring and screening data, maintenance teams have less data, but it contains more information to analyze, which is a more efficient use of their time.
Analysts need to take their expertise on-site to the plant. The technology discussed here is not replacing their years of experience in keeping turbomachinery spinning. It’s helping them spend less time collecting data, less time filtering through useless data, and more time focusing on the equipment most likely to cause the next outage. Getting ahead of these problems prevents the excitement from the calls about outages and operator messages regarding odd equipment behavior. It makes overseeing equipment boring. But in a good way.
Content originally published in UPTIME magazine/ReliabilityWeb.com, February/March, 2019 edition, https://reliabilityweb.com/articles/entry/technologies-that-make-asset-monitoring-boring-in-a-good-way.